QUETTA: The Balochistan High Court (BHC) voiced strong dissatisfaction on Thursday regarding the provincial government’s sluggish approach in handling a constitutional petition challenging the Mines and Minerals Act. The case was heard by a bench consisting of Justice Kamran Mulakhel and Justice Najmudding Mengal, who expressed clear frustration over the government’s failure to submit a timely response.
During the proceedings, Justice Kamran Mulakhel pointed out that the government had not even managed to file its reply despite ample time being granted. He remarked that such delays in court proceedings reflect poorly on the overall administrative efficiency of the provincial authorities. The judge emphasized that if the government’s performance in court is any indication, it raises serious concerns about its ability to manage critical legislative matters effectively.
The bench further criticized the government for employing what it described as deliberate stalling tactics, which only serve to increase the burden on the judiciary. “The courts are not a place where the government can come to wash away its shortcomings,” the judges remarked, highlighting the importance of respecting judicial timelines and procedures. This stern rebuke underscores the court’s impatience with the ongoing procrastination that hampers the resolution of significant legal challenges.
Advocate General Adnan Basharat assured the court that the government intends to submit its reply during the next hearing. However, the court made it clear that this submission is not optional and ordered the government to comply within a strict deadline of one week. The judges stressed that adherence to court orders is mandatory and urged the provincial administration to take its judicial obligations seriously to avoid further delays.
Following these exchanges, the high court adjourned the case for one week, setting a firm timeline for the government’s response. This development comes amid growing public interest in the Mines and Minerals Act, which has been a subject of debate due to its implications on resource management and provincial autonomy. The court’s firm stance signals its commitment to ensuring that legal processes are not hindered by bureaucratic inertia.
It is worth noting that the Mines and Minerals Act has been under scrutiny for its impact on the exploitation and regulation of natural resources in Balochistan, a province rich in mineral wealth yet grappling with governance challenges. The court’s insistence on prompt government action reflects the judiciary’s role in safeguarding constitutional mandates and promoting transparency in resource governance.
