ISLAMABAD: The recent inclusion of Shadab Khan in Pakistan’s national T20 squad has stirred considerable controversy, with former opener Ahmed Shehzad openly criticizing the team management’s selection strategy. Shehzad asserted that the decision to bring Shadab into the side came at the direct expense of promising pacer Sufiyan Muqeem, who was dropped despite his potential and recent performances. This move has ignited a broader discussion about the fairness and transparency of selection policies within Pakistan cricket.
During a detailed discussion on a private sports channel, Shehzad elaborated that not only was Sufiyan Muqeem sidelined, but Abrar Ahmed, another highly ranked and in-form bowler, was also left out to make room for Shadab Khan. He emphasized that Abrar’s impressive T20 ranking and recent displays warranted his inclusion, yet the management favored Shadab, which, Shehzad, has negatively impacted the team’s balance and performance. He went further to criticize the coaching staff, suggesting that the team’s struggles stem from questionable decisions at the helm.
Adding to the debate, former fast bowler Mohammad Amir shared his perspective, recalling his own experience under coach Mickey Arthur. Amir pointed out that despite being a favorite initially, his failure to perform in the Asia Cup led to his exclusion from the subsequent Test series, highlighting how performance remains a key criterion in team selection under foreign coaches. This insight sheds light on the contrasting approaches coaches may adopt when managing Pakistan’s cricket team compared to their home countries.
Ex-cricketer Abdur Rauf also weighed in, noting that foreign coaches often apply different selection standards when working abroad. He explained that these parameters tend to shift once they take charge of Pakistan’s team, sometimes leading to unexpected or controversial choices. This observation helps contextualize the ongoing debates surrounding the current squad makeup and the rationale behind certain player omissions.
The controversy gained further momentum following Pakistan’s narrow defeat to England in the ICC Men’s T20 World Cup 2026 Super 8 match held on February 24. Chasing a target of 165 runs, Pakistan fell short by two wickets, largely due to a spectacular century by England’s Harry Brook. The loss triggered widespread criticism from fans and cricket analysts alike, who scrutinized key tactical decisions and individual performances within the Pakistan camp.
Among the focal points of criticism was Pakistan captain Babar Azam’s sluggish batting, which many felt put unnecessary pressure on the middle order. Additionally, Shadab Khan’s all-round performance came under intense scrutiny, particularly for conceding too many runs during the crucial middle overs. Experts argued that his inability to contain the scoring rate allowed Harry Brook to settle in comfortably and take control of the innings. This was especially disappointing given the match was played on a turning track at Pallekele, where Shadab’s leg-spin was expected to be more effective.
Analysts also highlighted Shadab’s inconsistent form in recent matches, questioning whether his current level justifies his continued selection over other deserving players like Abrar Ahmed and Sufiyan Muqeem. The exclusion of these bowlers, both of whom have shown promise and consistency, has raised eyebrows and intensified calls for a more merit-based approach to team selection. As Pakistan’s cricket fraternity continues to debate these issues, the pressure mounts on the management to justify their choices and deliver better results in upcoming fixtures.
