In a firm rebuttal on Monday, Iran’s Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Qalibaf categorically dismissed claims of ongoing negotiations with the United States, directly contradicting recent assertions made by former US President Donald Trump. Trump had suggested that discussions with Tehran were progressing, but Qalibaf made it clear that no such communication had taken place.
Qalibaf emphasized that the Iranian government has not engaged in any form of dialogue with Washington, labeling the reports of talks as deliberate misinformation. He expressed concern that these false narratives were being propagated to manipulate global oil markets and financial systems, potentially destabilizing international economic conditions. This stance highlights Tehran’s skepticism toward US intentions and the broader geopolitical implications of the conflict.
Further elaborating on Iran’s position, Qalibaf stressed that the Iranian populace demands a resolute and decisive response to any acts of aggression against the country. His remarks underscored the government’s unwavering commitment to a hardline approach in the ongoing standoff with the United States and its allies. He also reiterated the unity between the Iranian administration, the Supreme Leader, and the people in resisting what he described as external pressures aimed at undermining Iran’s sovereignty.
Earlier statements from Tehran’s Foreign Ministry echoed this sentiment, acknowledging the existence of mechanisms to ease tensions but insisting that Washington must take the initiative to open dialogue. The ministry’s spokesperson pointedly remarked, “We did not start this war,” placing the onus on the United States to de-escalate the situation. Iranian officials also suggested that Trump’s recent threats might be a strategic move to buy time before launching significant military actions, describing such tactics as misleading.
These denials came shortly after Trump announced a temporary five-day halt on planned strikes targeting Iranian power infrastructure. He described this pause as a result of “very good and productive” discussions aimed at preventing further hostilities. However, Tehran’s state media and government representatives have consistently rejected any claims of direct or indirect negotiations with US officials. They argue that the United States is exploiting the situation to influence energy prices while simultaneously preparing for potential military operations.
Analysts observing the situation note that the conflicting narratives from Tehran and Washington reflect a deep-rooted mistrust that complicates efforts to resolve the crisis. Now entering its fourth week, the conflict continues to unsettle global markets and heighten geopolitical uncertainty. Meanwhile, reports have surfaced about mediation attempts by regional players such as Turkey, Egypt, and Pakistan, though Iran has made it clear that it is not engaging in formal talks with American representatives.
