Flight-tracking platforms have recently exhibited unusual anomalies in the regions of Indian Illegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir (IIOJK) and Sialkot, coinciding with abnormal GPS signal disturbances linked to the ongoing conflict in the Middle East. A notable case involved Qatar Airways flight QR630, arriving from Doha at approximately 2:15am on the night between Saturday and Sunday. While the aircraft was approaching Sialkot, tracking data on FlightRadar24 inaccurately indicated a diversion to Jammu airport in IIOJK.
This inconsistency is believed to stem from GPS spoofing, signal jumps, or glitches in location data. Similar occurrences were documented earlier in June, when three flights were incorrectly shown at alternate locations during their approaches to Sialkot. For instance, on June 26, flight FZ337 from Dubai landed at Sialkot as scheduled, yet tracking systems displayed it as diverted to Jammu. The following day, June 27, flights G9552 from Sharjah and FZ337 from Dubai again landed in Sialkot, but their tracking data suggested landings at Jammu airport in IIOJK.
Comparable location errors have also been reported for flights destined for Lahore’s Allama Iqbal International Airport. Aviation specialists explain that GPS spoofing, sudden signal jumps, location glitches, or errors in ADS-B data can cause flight-tracking websites to show inaccurate aircraft positions. Since ADS-B technology depends on satellite-based positioning, any interference can distort the location information broadcast by the aircraft.
Such discrepancies are not limited to aviation; similar tracking errors have been observed with ships and other vehicles, which sometimes appear at incorrect locations on digital platforms when their positioning data is compromised. The close proximity of Sialkot and Jammu—approximately 40 kilometers apart—may further contribute to these tracking anomalies, with unreliable position data causing the system to display Jammu as an alternative location.
Experts from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) emphasize that these tracking errors do not necessarily reflect issues with the aircraft’s onboard navigation systems. Instead, they often result from mismatches between satellite signals and the data presented by third-party flight-tracking websites, highlighting the complexities involved in real-time digital tracking during periods of signal interference.
Leave an opinion